Buy one, get 24 free!

I just have to share this because it’s so stunning.

You want to improve education in rural India. A good start is to improve attendance. So you look at the causes of non-attendance: poor transport to/from school; children having no uniforms; parents having poor incentive / not seeing the incentive to send their children to school; children being ill because of intestinal worms. You design programmes to solve each problem. 

Any of these sounds like a good idea. You could persuade a donor to fund any of them.

Well, crickey, it turns out that the differences in performance are just vast. The charming-sounding de-worming programme is fully 25 times cheaper than making payments to families if their children show up to school: a 96% discount. That is, for every child you reach through a ‘conditional cash transfer’ programme, fully 24 needlessly miss out. 

Magic?

Here’s the really amazing thing. If you de-worm children School A in the village, you get better attendance not only there, but also in School B down the road – where you did precisely nothing. Magic? Well, it’s because worms are infectious and children play in close proximity – so de-worming School A reduces the chance of a child in School B getting worms, so their attendance improves too. 

Salutory tale

Obviously the data here are striking in themselves. But what’s also remarkable is how rarely we see comparative data like these. Without them, for all we know, we’re routinely funding the uber-expensive, uber-wasteful programmes.

If we’re to make most difference with our charitable giving, we need to get these data. We need to fund charities to get them, or – better – fund somebody independent to get them.  

(This example comes from J-PAL - the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab in Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which specialises in randomised control trials of techniques for poverty alleviation.)

Source: http://southasia.oneworld.net/todaysheadlines/deworming-improves-school-attendance-says-report

About these ads
This entry was posted in Analysing giving, Promoting giving and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Buy one, get 24 free!

  1. Pingback: Book: It Ain’t What You Give, It’s The Way That You Give It | Caroline Fiennes @carolinefiennes

  2. Pingback: Does donor education achieve anything? Here’s how to find out | Caroline Fiennes @carolinefiennes

  3. Pingback: More interesting than what charity programmes achieve is what they don’t achieve | Caroline Fiennes @carolinefiennes

  4. Pingback: How do you know if your charity is making any difference? Take control | Caroline Fiennes @carolinefiennes

  5. Pingback: Does donor education achieve anything? Here’s how to find out | Giving Evidence

  6. Pingback: More interesting than what charity programmes achieve is what they don’t achieve | Giving Evidence

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s